Around the second year of a Boston degree, most parents run the same arithmetic. They add up the rent paid so far, multiply out the two years remaining, and arrive at the thought: for that money, wouldn’t buying make more sense?
The honest answer is that there is no fixed answer. Four years can come out ahead of renting and it can come out behind. Anyone who answers without your numbers is guessing.
What is clear is what moves the result. These are the items I actually work through in a consultation, in order.
The holding period is often not four years
The calculation starts with how long you will hold the property, and this is the assumption that breaks most often.
An undergraduate four years becomes six or seven when graduate school follows. It becomes two when a transfer or a change of plan arrives in year two. Real estate rewards longer holds, so buying on a four-year assumption and selling in year two flips the result almost every time.
So I ask this first: what happens if the plan changes in year two? Sell, rent it out, or hand it to another family member — the answer changes which property you should be looking at in the first place.
Costs land at both ends
Renting costs money once, on the way in. Buying costs money twice — going in and coming out.
Going in: closing costs, inspection, appraisal, recording. Coming out: brokerage commission, the state deeds excise, and closing costs again. The shorter the hold, the larger that round trip looms in the total.
People ask whether appreciation covers it. It has to exceed that round trip before there is any gain at all. When that point arrives is, practically speaking, the whole decision.
The monthly number is not just the mortgage
This is where buyers arriving from another market are most often surprised.
- Property tax, assessed annually, at a rate that differs by city.
- Condo fees, which in downtown Boston buildings are frequently substantial.
- Homeowner’s insurance, plus separate flood insurance near the water.
- Repairs. This is a city of old buildings. What was the landlord’s problem as a tenant becomes yours as an owner.
Compare a mortgage payment to rent without these and buying will look better than it is.
Whose name is on the deed changes the tax
This is the part international families miss most often.
A student on an F-1 visa can legally own property. Qualifying for a mortgage in their own name, with little US income or credit, is the hard part — so parents often buy in theirs. That choice carries a provision worth knowing before, not after.
Under FIRPTA, when a foreign person disposes of US real property, the buyer must withhold 15% of the total amount realized and remit it to the IRS. It is a prepayment rather than the final tax, settled through a return — but it means a meaningful share of the sale proceeds is tied up at the moment of sale. Exceptions exist, including certain residences the buyer intends to occupy.
Where the student actually lived there, the federal home-sale gain exclusion comes into view instead: 24 months of ownership and 24 months of use as a main home within the five years before sale. Four years of real residence satisfies the use test on its face — but whose name is on the deed, and that person’s tax status, decide whether it applies.
This is a CPA’s and an attorney’s question, not mine. What I can do is make sure you know the provision exists before you choose, and tell you which structures a lender will actually finance.
How the decision gets made
Four things have to be settled before the arithmetic means anything.
- A minimum holding period — not the plan, but the span you could hold through the worst case
- The name on the deed — student or parent, and what that choice does to financing and tax
- Source of funds — if money is coming from abroad, documentation starts before you are under contract, not during
- The exit if plans change — sale or rental
Settle those and the rest is arithmetic. I will run it on your actual figures, and when renting is the better answer I will say so. A calculation run by someone with a reason to sell is a different thing from a calculation.
If financing without US credit or the September 1st rental cycle is the more pressing question, I have written about buying without a long US credit history and Boston’s September 1st rush separately. If you want the numbers run, start here.
This is general information, not tax or legal advice. Confirm your own situation with a CPA and an attorney.
Questions
Common questions
For a four-year degree in Boston, is buying better than renting?
There is no fixed answer. What decides it is how long the property is actually held, the transaction costs on the way in and again on the way out, condo fees and property tax, what the same money would rent, and the chance that plans change midway. Four years can come out ahead and it can come out behind, so the question has to be run on the family's own numbers rather than on a rule of thumb.
If the parents are non-resident and sell the US property, how is it taxed?
Under FIRPTA, when a foreign person disposes of a U.S. real property interest the buyer must deduct and withhold 15% of the total amount realized and remit it to the IRS. That is a prepayment rather than the final tax, settled through a return, and exceptions exist including certain residences the buyer intends to occupy. The specifics belong with a CPA.
Can the capital gains exclusion apply to a home a student lived in?
The federal home-sale exclusion applies where the seller owned the home for 24 months and used it as a main residence for 24 months within the five years before the sale, excluding up to $250,000 of gain for a single filer and $500,000 for joint filers. Four years of actual residence satisfies the use test on its face, but whose name is on the deed and that person's tax status change the outcome, so it needs a CPA's review.
Written by Diana Yeji Kim — REALTOR® at eXp Realty, serving Greater Boston in English, Korean, and Japanese.
← All articles